| Titre : |
Criteria for evaluating and improving irrigation management |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Chambers, R. |
| Mention d'édition : |
Institute of Development Studies/University of Sussex |
| Editeur : |
Institute of Development Studies/University of Sussex |
| Année de publication : |
1976 |
| ISBN/ISSN/EAN : |
CI-04943 |
| Note générale : |
This paper seeks to identify objectives and creteria for use in evaluating and improving the operation and management of surface gravity irrigation systems, particularly those with a water control bureaucracy. Many different sorts of objective are attributed to irrigation projects and these generate many different criteria for evaluation. Evaluations should avoid either taking refuge in a single, simple measurable criterion or being swamped by overinclusive admission of too many criteria. Five generic criteria are proposed as a framework for the organisation of evaluation - productivity, equity, convenience, environmental stability, and cost-effectiveness. |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Mots-clés : |
Irrigation Gestion de l'eau Production Environnement |
| Index. décimale : |
631.58 Méthodes de culture : jachère, assolement irrigation |
| Résumé : |
This paper seeks to identify objectives and creteria for use in evaluating and improving the operation and management of surface gravity irrigation systems, particularly those with a water control bureaucracy. Many different sorts of objective are attributed to irrigation projects and these generate many different criteria for evaluation. Evaluations should avoid either taking refuge in a single, simple measurable criterion or being swamped by overinclusive admission of too many criteria. Five generic criteria are proposed as a framework for the organisation of evaluation - productivity, equity, convenience, environmental stability, and cost-effectiveness. |
| Note de contenu : |
This paper seeks to identify objectives and creteria for use in evaluating and improving the operation and management of surface gravity irrigation systems, particularly those with a water control bureaucracy. Many different sorts of objective are attributed to irrigation projects and these generate many different criteria for evaluation. Evaluations should avoid either taking refuge in a single, simple measurable criterion or being swamped by overinclusive admission of too many criteria. Five generic criteria are proposed as a framework for the organisation of evaluation - productivity, equity, convenience, environmental stability, and cost-effectiveness. |
Criteria for evaluating and improving irrigation management [texte imprimé] / Chambers, R. . - Institute of Development Studies/University of Sussex . - Institute of Development Studies/University of Sussex, 1976. ISSN : CI-04943 This paper seeks to identify objectives and creteria for use in evaluating and improving the operation and management of surface gravity irrigation systems, particularly those with a water control bureaucracy. Many different sorts of objective are attributed to irrigation projects and these generate many different criteria for evaluation. Evaluations should avoid either taking refuge in a single, simple measurable criterion or being swamped by overinclusive admission of too many criteria. Five generic criteria are proposed as a framework for the organisation of evaluation - productivity, equity, convenience, environmental stability, and cost-effectiveness. Langues : Anglais ( eng)
| Mots-clés : |
Irrigation Gestion de l'eau Production Environnement |
| Index. décimale : |
631.58 Méthodes de culture : jachère, assolement irrigation |
| Résumé : |
This paper seeks to identify objectives and creteria for use in evaluating and improving the operation and management of surface gravity irrigation systems, particularly those with a water control bureaucracy. Many different sorts of objective are attributed to irrigation projects and these generate many different criteria for evaluation. Evaluations should avoid either taking refuge in a single, simple measurable criterion or being swamped by overinclusive admission of too many criteria. Five generic criteria are proposed as a framework for the organisation of evaluation - productivity, equity, convenience, environmental stability, and cost-effectiveness. |
| Note de contenu : |
This paper seeks to identify objectives and creteria for use in evaluating and improving the operation and management of surface gravity irrigation systems, particularly those with a water control bureaucracy. Many different sorts of objective are attributed to irrigation projects and these generate many different criteria for evaluation. Evaluations should avoid either taking refuge in a single, simple measurable criterion or being swamped by overinclusive admission of too many criteria. Five generic criteria are proposed as a framework for the organisation of evaluation - productivity, equity, convenience, environmental stability, and cost-effectiveness. |
|  |
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
